Asset Recovery Team Tight-lipped On Clar Foundation Case

Asset-Recovery-Team-Tight-lipped-On-Clar-Foundation-Case

The Asset Recovery and Property Retrieval Taskforce (AREPT) wishes to clarify its position regarding recent public discussions surrounding the Clar Hope Foundation, a matter that is currently before the courts of the Republic of Liberia for determination, predicated upon an action filed by the Foundation.

AREPT further clarifies that the matter is sub judice, meaning it is presently under judicial consideration. As such, the Taskforce is legally restrained from commenting on the merits of the case or disclosing details that are now before the court to the public, any individual or an official. This limitation does not reflect hesitation or retreat, but rather demonstrates AREPT’s respect for the rule of law and the independence of the Judiciary. The Taskforce will continue to comply fully with all court processes and orders while allowing the legal system to determine the matter in accordance with the law.

In a release issued during the weekend, AREPT emphasized that it is not deterred in the execution of its lawful mandate and remains resolute in ensuring transparency and accountability in the management and use of public resources. The Taskforce’s actions are guided strictly by the rule of law, due process, accountability, and its responsibilities under Executive Order No. 145.

The ongoing matter before the court arose from a lawful court subpoena of documents seeking to question the conversion of Government of Liberia funds, donors’ funds channeled through the Government of Liberia, and donor information related to the Clar Hope Foundation and the City of Hope Academy. This request does not constitute a determination of guilt, nor does it relate to the violation of any rights. AREPT’s inquiry is limited solely to issues of financial transparency, conversion of government assets, and compliance with applicable laws governing the use of public funds and solicitation.

In keeping with its mandate, AREPT notes that Count Five of Executive Order No. 145 authorizes the Taskforce to investigate circumstances where public assets or public funds are converted to private use, including instances where state resources may have been acquired directly through the use of official position and thereafter converted into private use. The Clar Hope Foundation and City of Hope Academy matter forms part of a broader review involving multiple institutions similarly situated and is not an isolated or selective action.

AREPT takes note of public interest and commentary on the institution and reiterates that investigations conducted by the Taskforce are evidence-based, impartial, and non-political. The Taskforce respects the authority and independence of the Judiciary and will proceed fully in accordance with all court orders while the matter remains pending before the court.

The Taskforce further stresses that no individual, foundation, or institution is above the law. Transparency and accountability are essential to protecting public trust and ensuring that institutions operating in the public interest do so with integrity and lawful funding.

AREPT calls on all Liberians, including public officials, to allow the court process to take its course, just as the Taskforce itself is doing. The administration of justice is best served when legal processes are respected and allowed to proceed without undue politicization or speculation.

AREPT encourages the public to remain assured that its work is not intended to disrupt social services or humanitarian initiatives, but to safeguard public resources and uphold accountability and the rule of law in the best interest of the Liberian people. The Asset Recovery and Property Retrieval Taskforce remains committed to tracing, identifying, and recovering stolen public assets; investigating the conversion of public assets to private use; examining the acquisition of private assets through the use of public authority and solicitation; and holding all those involved to account in keeping with the rule of law.

Leave a Reply